Phil Nugent Has No Role In GEECE

The following is a letter puplished by chcr, a co-moderator in IHUB, and presumably from Phil Nugent, whom we apparently got wrong information about, or his lawyer. No hard copy has been delivered to us.

We apologize, withdraw, rescind, retract and regret any errors we made concerning his ownership of GEECF.

As we would have had he called us and told us he was no longer a partner in it.
We're glad he read our blog, but we won't make the mistake of thinking he's a friend of ours again.

Posted by: chcr
In reply to: None Date:5/20/2005 12:19:41 PM
Post #of 2606

I wonder if Joe Shea will answer this letter I found???

May 16, 2005

Mr. Joe Shea, Editor-in-Chief joeshea@cal.net
The American Reporter joeshea@netcom.com
1812 N. Ivar Ave., no.5
Hollywood, CA 90028-5026

Dear Mr. Shea:

You are hereby notified that the factual content of your Internet posting entitled “Phil Nugent, ERHC Founder, Faces Issues With New Company” is FALSE. A public retraction to this posting is expected.

Mr. Nugent is not “battling to save his newest enterprise, Global Environmental Energy Corp”. Global is not an “enterprise” of Mr. Nugent’s; he does not have any interest in this company; he is not battling, fighting, struggling, or otherwise exerting himself to “save” this company; and, most importantly, the Sunday London Times article quoted does not mention Mr. Nugent!

For you to flatly state that Mr. Nugent or his company, ERHC, has any management or ownership interest in Global Environmental, a company that is described as insolvent and facing numerous punitive damage and director/investor actions against it, as well as possible tax liability actions, is not only patently libelous but could be characterized as an intentionally tortuous act made with the intention of causing financial harm to Mr. Nugent who is a stockholder of ERHE along with thousands of other people around the world. In fact, Mr. Phil H. Nugent filed a lawsuit on May 9, 2005 against GEECE in Civil District Court in the Parish of Orleans, state of Louisiana; specifically it is civil action Number 2005-6260 Division N-8. This is a suit for Breach of Contract and Dissolution of Partnership Agreement

Consequently, demand is made upon you to publicly withdraw and rescind these allegations and falsehoods. We expect you to print a public retraction on your website blog using the same size and style print as the original article. Failure to publicly retract these falsehoods within the next 3 business days will cause my client to seek redress against you in the Federal Court System of the United States of America.

Your immediate attention to clearing up this matter is appreciated.